Love, Sexuality and Pregnancy
A Lack of Information
Poor Contraceptive Choices Occur Frequently
When it comes to choosing the right contraceptive method, women with congenital heart disease require individual counseling. A study by the Competence Network unveiled a certain degree of ignorance.
Choosing the Wrong Contraceptive Method is Dangerous
Not every contraceptive method is suitable for each woman with congenital heart disease. In the case of certain heart defects, the wrong contraceptive method can even be a real health hazard. 37 percent of the women surveyed were on a birth control pill. Followed by condoms (26 percent), it was the most frequently used contraceptive. 12 percent of the study participants used a contraceptive coil, while 11 percent used the mini-pill. Especially women with cyanotic heart defects and Eisenmenger-syndrome frequently used contraceptives that were not suitable for them and might pose a health risk in such cases.
Poorly Informed
Furthermore, the study uncovered that almost 70 percent of the women surveyed had either not received advice regarding contraceptive methods and their potential risks at all, or they had to specifically ask their treating physician for this kind of information. For women with congenital heart disease to choose the right mode of contraception they should address their treating cardiologist, as well as their gynecologist, for respective counseling.
-
Scientific Details of the Study
Learn more about the study design, material and methods, as well as the study's background.
Contraception in women with congenital heart disease.
Vigl M1, Kaemmerer M, Seifert-Klauss V, Niggemeyer E, Nagdyman N, Trigas V, Bauer U, Schneider KT, Berger F, Hess J, Kaemmerer H.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 1;106(9):1317-21.Learn more about the study design, material and methods, as well as the background of the study:
Publications
-
1.11.2010
Contraception in women with congenital heart disease.
Vigl M, Kaemmerer M, Seifert-Klauss V, Niggemeyer E, Nagdyman N, Trigas V, Bauer U, Schneider KTM, Berger F, Hess J, Kaemmerer H
The American journal of cardiology 106, 9, 1317-21, (2010). Show this publication on PubMed.
-